This is a great secret for those who represent God. We cannot represent God by our own strength or righteousness - we are always weak and tend to sin - but he himself can represent himself in and through us if we let him. Representing God then becomes a double joy: not only the joy of being and doing something of ultimate Meaning, but also the joy that comes from God himself achieving this within us. He not only gives us the strength to represent him, but he also gives the will to do so, not just a general grand wish to represent him but a nitty-gritty change in our wills here and now so that we genuinely want what he wants. Are we angry because someone took advantage of us, and want to be angry? Well, he can remove our will to anger, as well as the anger itself, and replace it with love. This is supernatural! This is phenomenal!
I have myself discovered something of this, via that wonder little verse Philippians 2:13, "For God is at work in you to will and to work his good pleasure." See that part of my spiritual journey.
For each type, New View offers a means of evaluation (list only just begun 31 May 2009).
In the UK, "Does the structure adequately represent God?" was much discussed (and fought over) several hundred years (e.g. congregationalism v. presbyterianism v. episcopacy in the UK). Purpose is being debated now (for the true rather than official purpose of a congregation, look at what it is trying to distance itself from and what the leaders put a lot of their effort into urging people about): "To grow", "To preach the gospel", "To win souls for Christ", "To defend the doctrine", "To gather for worship", "To win the locality for Christ", "Mission", "To be the church in this locality" and so on.
From the New View, some of these are valid. 'To grow' is not valid, even though many leaderships focus on it, because it is self-absorbing and is a characteristic rather than a purpose - and it says nothing about representing the Living God. The following are more valid because they may be seen as part of representing God: gospel-preaching, doctrine-defence, locality-winning, mission. But "To be the church in this locality" is possibly the best expression, though it is frequently used almost as an excuse to maintain status quo and comfortable lives of members.
But none of them express the whole potential to represent God by a distinct group in a community. We need a new view on why distinct groups (congregations) should form in local communities.
Number of visitors to these pages:
Copyright (c) Andrew Basden 2008-4, but you may copy this page as long as every copy includes this full copyright notice, and the copying is not for financial gain.
Created: 31 October 2008.
Last updated: 31 May 2009 church congregations. 22 June 2009 phil 2:13 'all.suff'.
The Church
'The Church' has many meanings: the worldwide people of God, a denomination (e.g. the Methodist Church, or New Frontiers International), an organisation (e.g. the Church of Scotland), a congregation (e.g. Edinburgh City Fellowship), a building (e.g. the church in the main street), and so on. In all senses it represents something of God to the rest of the world, to a greater or lesser extent.
Church as Worldwide People of God
Church as Denomination
Church as Organisation
Church as Congregation
A congregation is a social institution or distinct group in a local community. It will (soon) have a structure (at least leaders and flock) and a either goal or a tacit purpose (reason why it is functioning as a distinct group). We may critique both structure and purpose.
Church as Building
These pages present 'New View' theology. Comments, queries welcome.
. Written on the Amiga with Protext.